![]() |
| Performing a play written by someone else is not a 'Fair Use' of the script. |
Students often get a bad impression from their teachers about what comprises 'Fair Use' under the copyright laws. Students are taught that if they correctly quote something, and include appropriate attribution to the correct source or author, that the use is academically fair. It's only when students try to pass off something somebody else wrote as their own work that they get in trouble.
The reason those students get in trouble is the issue of plagiarism. This is a matter of academic ethics -- but not a matter of copyright law. Out in the non-scholastic real world, it doesn't matter whether you include correct attributions or not -- if you include a part of someone else's song, lyrics, novel, poem, advertising copy, or other copyrighted creative work in one of your copyrighted creative works without their permission, you've violated that person's copyright. Yes, even if you put their name on it.
But since it's the law, there are some exceptions. Of course. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright statute provides an exception to a creator’s exclusive copyrights for ‘fair use.’ The fair use provision states that use of a copyrighted work or image “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”
The statutory factors used to determine whether any particular use of a work is ‘fair use’ include: “(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2) the nature of the copyrighted work;(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.”
If you are a songwriter, or a band, it is nearly certain that you are not a duly organized and IRS approved non-profit educational institution. You write and perform music most likely with the full intention of making money at it. Some people are otherwise gainfully employed or retired and play mostly for free--but this doesn't make them a non-profit educational institution. If you are performing, recording, selling CDs, getting paid for gigs, or playing for free at places like farmers markets where your role is to help other people make money, your music is what the copyright statute means by, 'of a commercial nature.'
Therefore, if you are inserting pieces of other people's tunes, lyrics, novels, poems, movie lines, or anything else under copyright into your music, you will not be able to successfully claim that you were protected by the fair use doctrine. You will be guilty of copyright violations--and you just might get sued. Those re-makes of classic 80s tunes you hear cut into modern hiphop or pop commercial tunes today? Those songwriters purchased a license to do that--or, more likely, the copyright was already owned by the same music industry corporation that did the re-make.
Find the copyright owner, and get permission. License before you splice. But you've got your own sound anyway--why do you need someone else's?



